Submissions

Login or Register to make a submission.

Author Guidelines

Authors are invited to make a submission to this journal. All submissions will be assessed by an editor to determine whether they meet the aims and scope of this journal. Those considered to be a good fit will be sent for peer review before determining whether they will be accepted or rejected.

Before making a submission, authors are responsible for obtaining permission to publish any material included with the submission, such as photos, documents and datasets. All authors identified on the submission must consent to be identified as an author. Where appropriate, research should be approved by an appropriate ethics committee in accordance with the legal requirements of the study's country.

An editor may desk reject a submission if it does not meet minimum standards of quality. Before submitting, please ensure that the study design and research argument are structured and articulated properly. The title should be concise and the abstract should be able to stand on its own. This will increase the likelihood of reviewers agreeing to review the paper. When you're satisfied that your submission meets this standard, please follow the checklist below to prepare your submission.

Submission Preparation Checklist

All submissions must meet the following requirements.

  • This submission meets the requirements outlined in the Author Guidelines.
  • This submission has not been previously published, nor is it before another journal for consideration.
  • All references have been checked for accuracy and completeness.
  • All tables and figures have been numbered and labeled.
  • Permission has been obtained to publish all photos, datasets and other material provided with this submission.

Articles

Section default policy

Review Article

Review Articles provide comprehensive, critical, and balanced overviews of significant developments within a specific area of research. They should synthesize existing literature, highlight key advances, identify knowledge gaps, and propose future directions, offering valuable insights for both specialists and a broader scientific audience.

Submissions must be well-organized, objective, and supported by an extensive and up-to-date reference list. Authors are encouraged to include clear conceptual frameworks or summary figures that help integrate findings across studies. Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses should adhere to recognized reporting standards such as PRISMA guidelines.

Typical length is 4,000–8,000 words, depending on topic depth, excluding references, tables, and figures. The writing should be precise, engaging, and accessible, reflecting scholarly rigor and clarity of argument.

All Review Articles undergo rigorous Editorial review to ensure accuracy, comprehensiveness, and relevance to the journal’s scope. Ethical standards, including proper citation practices and declaration of conflicts of interest, must be strictly followed.

Research Highlight

Research Highlights provide concise summaries of recent, significant scientific advances that are of high interest to the journal’s readership. They aim to explain the importance, context, and implications of newly published research in a clear and accessible way, bridging the gap between complex findings and a broader scientific audience.

These articles should not present original experimental data but rather offer a critical overview or commentary on one or a few recently published studies. Authors should emphasize the novelty, relevance, and potential impact of the research, while maintaining an objective and balanced perspective.

Manuscripts are typically short (800–1,500 words) and may include a small number of references and one or two illustrative figures or tables. Research Highlights should be written in engaging, precise language that captures the essence of the study and its significance without excessive technical detail.

All submissions are subject to editorial review and may undergo peer review at the Editor’s discretion. Accepted articles must adhere to the journal’s standards for accuracy, originality, and ethical reporting.

Case Report

Case Reports describe unique, rare, or educationally valuable clinical or experimental cases that contribute meaningful insights to scientific or medical understanding. They may highlight unusual presentations, novel diagnostic approaches, innovative treatments, or unexpected outcomes that advance knowledge in the field.

Submissions should present a clear and well-documented narrative including background, case description, diagnostic assessments, management or intervention, and discussion of clinical relevance. The report must emphasize the learning value, originality, and implications for future research or practice.

Manuscripts are typically concise, generally 1,500–2,500 words, and may include up to two figures or tables. Authors must obtain informed consent from the patient (or legal guardian) prior to publication and ensure that identifying information is fully anonymized. Ethical approval is required when applicable.

All Case Reports are subject to editorial evaluation and may undergo peer review. Acceptance is based on the case’s novelty, clarity, and educational significance. The journal adheres to COPE and ICMJE guidelines to ensure ethical publication practices.

Proof of Concept

Proof of Concept (POC) Articles present preliminary findings that demonstrate the feasibility, functionality, or potential effectiveness of a new idea, method, technology, or therapeutic approach. These studies serve as early evidence supporting innovative hypotheses or experimental designs that may lead to more extensive research or practical applications.

Submissions should clearly define the concept being tested, describe the methodology and validation approach, and present results that substantiate the proof of feasibility. Emphasis should be placed on originality, technical soundness, and the potential impact or translational value of the concept rather than exhaustive data or large-scale validation.

POC Articles are typically concise, generally 2,000–3,500 words, and may include essential figures or tables that effectively demonstrate key findings. Authors must ensure that ethical and safety standards are fully observed, particularly when involving biological samples, human data, or experimental systems.

All submissions undergo peer review to assess scientific validity, clarity, and innovation. Accepted POC Articles should provide a strong foundation for future studies and align with the journal’s mission to advance emerging ideas and technologies responsibly.

Commentary

Commentaries provide scholarly opinions, insights, or critical perspectives on recent research, emerging scientific issues, or developments relevant to the journal’s field. They are intended to stimulate discussion, offer interpretation, or present alternative viewpoints rather than report new experimental data.

A Commentary should be focused, well-argued, and supported by relevant evidence or citations. Authors are encouraged to provide context, highlight the broader significance of the topic, and maintain a balanced and professional tone. Commentaries may discuss papers previously published in the journal or address wider conceptual or ethical questions in the discipline.

Typical length is 1,000–2,000 words, with a concise title and limited references. Commentaries should be clearly written for a scientifically literate audience, emphasizing clarity and originality of thought.

All submissions are reviewed by the editorial team and may be sent for peer review at the Editor’s discretion. Commentaries must adhere to the journal’s standards of academic integrity, ethical conduct, and responsible authorship.

Privacy Statement

The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.

RevisX